<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dave Marsh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davemarsh.us/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davemarsh.us</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:27:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>KATHY RICH</title>
		<link>http://davemarsh.us/?p=1011</link>
		<comments>http://davemarsh.us/?p=1011#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dreaming in Hindi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathy Rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life and death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Red Devil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[young adults cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemarsh.us/?p=1011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You probably never knew my friend Kathy Rich. You really missed something. A good way to find out what is to read Margalit Fox&#8217;s obituary for her in the April 7 New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/07/health/katherine-russell-rich-who-wrote-of-cancer-fight-dies-at-56.html?hpw). I&#8217;d bet all my socks that Fox knew Kathy, partly because she captures so much that&#8217;s crucial about her and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>You probably never knew my friend Kathy Rich. You really missed something. A good way to find out what is to read Margalit Fox&#8217;s obituary for her in the April 7 New York <em>T</em><em>imes</em> (<a title="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/07/health/katherine-russell-rich-who-wrote-of%0A-cancer-fight-dies-at-56.html?hpw" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/07/health/katherine-russell-rich-who-wrote-of%0A-cancer-fight-dies-at-56.html?hpw" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/07/health/katherine-russell-rich-who-wrote-of-cancer-fight-dies-at-56.html?hpw</a>). I&#8217;d bet all my socks that Fox knew Kathy, partly because she captures so much that&#8217;s crucial about her and partly because Kathy seemed to know everybody. (I seem that way too and we had more than one laugh about our mutual reputations in this regard.) </strong><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>I&#8217;m not so sure Kathy would be thrilled about the headline&#8211;she did so much more than fight cancer, although to a lot of folks it would maybe seem like she just lived her life (likethat&#8217;s a little thing). But her book, </strong><em><strong>T</strong></em><em><strong>he Red Devil</strong></em><strong>, is the definitive account of the price of surviving cancer&#8211;in her case, a 19 year struggle against stage IV breast cancer, and yes, I know that sounds impossible. All the more reason for you to read it, for anybody who is beginning or in the middle of cancer treatment to know it by heart, which is what happens when you read it. </strong><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>It is not a guidebook on how to survive. Stage IV is lethal, and after a couple of decades even Kathy Rich couldn&#8217;t live with it anymore. Fuck that. What matters is, she <span style="text-decoration: underline;">lived.</span> </strong><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>I met Kathy in &#8217;94, I think, or maybe late &#8217;93. I told our mutual friend Joanne Goldberg that I was going to up to Sloan-Kettering, the NYC cancer hospita, to do something else. She said that Kathy was in the hospital with stage four breast cancer, and she was a writer too. I ought to meet her. I&#8217;ve gotten better advice but not often. </strong><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Kathy was a horror, as anyone is after bone marrow transplant. Swollen of face, scrawny of limb, bald, her room a havoc. There were no pictures around but I understood for other reasons&#8211;personality, confidence, but not complaints&#8211;that she was under what had previously been normal circumstances an attractive woman.</strong><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Sitting in the chair next to the bed talking to her was a guy who turned out to be the best friend of my own family doctor. He and I sat by for an hour or two, as Kathy held forth about the travails of the hour&#8211;not just cancer, but the treachery of magazine jouranlism and of the men in her life. She did not so much continually reiterate as act our her intention of beating her illness&#8230;fuck cancer, she was more or less in a mood to beat death itself. And you had to think, yeah, yeah, she might.</strong><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>We had journalism in common, which we had practiced very differently but there is not all that much distance between <em>Rolling Stone </em>and <em>Allure</em>, come to that; and we had had very different experiences of cancer, and while what had already happened to my duaghter Kristen and what not been happening to Kathy suck equally, they are quite different&#8211;survival without the disease relinquishing its grip might be worse than death, or so we had to suppose. But we also had to suppose that living was better tahn dying, and there you are, the paradox of young adults with cancer. &#8220;Can&#8217;t stop won&#8217;t stop,&#8221; indeed.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Anyway, we supposed both things together and for all our differences, after that day, she was my friend and I tried to be hers. I did what I could to support her book, when it came out, and I knew I could send any young woman who needed it to her book and thence to Kathy herself and they would always have some wisdom imparted from that source. We have many more friends in common for many other reasons.</strong></p>
<p><strong>T</strong><strong>hen, when she didn&#8217;t die, Kathy went off to India to study the language. She had a habit of sort of disappearing for a couple of years and then turning back up, always chastened, never less determined, and she&#8217;d tell me about the journey, the weird people she met, what she&#8217;d learned, what she decided not to learn, how many relapses and surgeries and dodged bullets had come across her path. I&#8217;d fill her in on what I&#8217;d been doing. We&#8217;d do a little gossiping, we&#8217;d laugh, we&#8217;d both wonder more than we let on how long anyone could survive stage IV breast cancer (as the saying goes, there is no stage V). I don&#8217;t know what she assumed. I assumed she was so tough and smart, she might outlive me, at least, and probably a whole lot of other people. (And in a whole lot of the other cases she did and hell yeah, that&#8217;s something to brag about.)</strong></p>
<p><strong>And that was it. The second book, <em>Dreaming in Hindi,</em> was both a struggle to read &#8212; it was so internalized, it was so unmetaphoric, so literally true. Which mean you couldn&#8217;t put it down either. It&#8217;s really not about learning to speak Hindi, and it&#8217;s not even a travel book, or a book about how to live in cultures that are poles apart. It&#8217;s about trying to inhabit the mind of strangers, maybe. And it is ruthless about the strangers, the author, the world in which it occurs, and out of that ruthlessness comes a stronger sense of Kathy&#8217;s intelligence, courage, and determination than you get in the cancer book. I read a few chapters and thought about them and read some more. Sometimes a year would go by and I wouldn&#8217;t touch it and then I&#8217;d dive in again and get lost in her head. I never told her this&#8211;it was embarassing, no one reads books like that, it&#8217;s like an implicit criticism. But really all it means is, you don&#8217;t drink a strong bottle to the bottom any way but warily&#8230;if the contents are as pure on your palate as they are powerful.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Kathy&#8217;s struggle seemed endless: when we met, I had hair and Kathy didn&#8217;t, then I lost about half of mine and the rest turned gray, while hers grew back and looked just fine. Twenty years is a very very long time. And most of that time, we had no idea what hte hell was up with her. But when I sent a newly diagnosed friend, whose tumor was also at stage four and also seemed indolent, to talk to her, it was just the right thing to do and Kathy and I emailed about it but we didn&#8217;t talk on the phone or see one another for lunch or any of that. I didn&#8217;t know such a serious relapse had occurred&#8211;although I knew there were relapses, they were pretty much continual&#8211; and the news took my breath away that Saturday morning.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Kathy was nothing like Kris Carr, who has an indolent tumor and has an hilarious survival yarn about it that has, I suppose, saved many lives, presuming that relying on eating a lot of wheatgrass and other dietary stuff, and yoga, etc. has anything to do with surviving cancer. I don&#8217;t know what Kathy ate and if I had asked her, she&#8217;d have very likely said something that amounted to, &#8220;What made that your business, buster,&#8221; and moved on to what she was actually interested in, which was her life. (Skeptics are like that and no journalist worth anything is not a skeptic, even if the writer in question is also a true believer.)</strong></p>
<p><strong>But these kind of semi-survivable tumors do exist and not only in breast cancer. They&#8217;re rare but so are the kind of people who know how to make a life, really a life not just a series of struggling days. Kathy taught me that, and how you have to live differently and not compromise a single one of your goals or principles as you fight, because you fight. And that it could be done.</strong></p>
<p><strong>I asked her once why she left <em>Allure</em>, and she said some of the things about it that are in the Times article and then&#8211;now that I think of it, it might have been that day in the hospital&#8211;she spun this long, rather mordantly funny story about her last days in the fashion journalism world, and how Conde Nast reacted to her departure: They gave her a lunch with the staff, or something like that, and a Prada bag, the same thing they gave everyone who left in relatively good graces. The message was not &#8220;I&#8217;m nothing special,&#8221; the message was &#8220;they don&#8217;t know I&#8217;m something special.&#8221; Is there bitterness attached to that? Well, there ought to be.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Kathy wasn&#8217;t everyone, she was as specific a someone as anybody I&#8217;ve had the luck to know and care about. And I am pissed off about it to this day, because she&#8217;s right, the devil of cancer is red, not black. Blood red. And to this day, when I see Prada&#8211;the logo, the clothes, the ads&#8211;I think about Kathy Rich and how little respect she got and how much she deserved.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Well, all I&#8217;m trying to say is, Kathy Rich was a great person and I loved her, truly I did. And, you know, as long as I&#8217;m here, she&#8217;s here, I&#8217;ll make sure of remembering her however I can. And telling you about it is part of that.</strong></p>
<p><strong>So startled and sad as I was when I heard the news, I didn&#8217;t cry. I started to and then I got to thinking about Kathy and how it was that we met and how it was that we were friends, and I think the tears just got beaten back by the only thing that sometimes can do that, even in the face of death, which is the living truth, as we have ourselves witnessed it.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Here&#8217;s what she taught me in a nutshell: You have to die and you have to bear it in mind. Then you have to go out and be who you are and let the dying take care of itself. And rage, rage, because that isn&#8217;t Tinkerbell&#8217;s light that&#8217;s dying, it&#8217;s your own and, goddamn it, it’s irreplaceable—irreplaceable to everybody not just you.</strong></p>
<p><strong>So don&#8217;t clap your hands to save Kathy Rich, just live your life and refuse to forget that it will end someday. That’s not just the acclamation she deserves. It’s the one she earned. </strong><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davemarsh.us/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1011</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AUSTIN HOPES AND DREAMS</title>
		<link>http://davemarsh.us/?p=1002</link>
		<comments>http://davemarsh.us/?p=1002#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alejandro escovedo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Springsteen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Alvarez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eliza Gilkyson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy LaFave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Ely]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juanes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lester Bangs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Little Richard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low Anthem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rock and Rap Confidential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smokey Robinson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Earle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SXSW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woody Guthrie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrecking Ball album]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemarsh.us/?p=1002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wrote this for Rock &#38; Rap Confidential, the (now online) newsletter about music and politics I&#8217;ve edited with Lee Ballinger for thirty years&#8211;we started right about this time of year, too, I think. I&#8217;ve said very little at RRC in recent months, and this topic (suggested by Lee) seems a good place to get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I wrote this for Rock &amp; Rap Confidential, the (now online) newsletter about music and politics I&#8217;ve edited with Lee Ballinger for thirty years&#8211;we started right about this time of year, too, I think. I&#8217;ve said very little at RRC in recent months, and this topic (suggested by Lee) seems a good place to get in and start wrestlin&#8217; with written words again.</strong></p>
<p><strong>You can subscribe to RRC, which sends out news items and various sorts of analysis on a regular basis, by going to rockrap.com. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Dave </strong></p>
<p><strong>Please feel free to forward or post this RRC Extra widely. We only ask that you include the information that anyone can subscribe free of charge by sending their email address to </strong><strong><a title="mailto:rockrap@aol.com" href="mailto:rockrap@aol.com" target="_blank">rockrap@aol.com</a>. </strong><strong>If you ever wish to unsubscribe, just send an email with “unsubscribe” in the subject line to </strong><strong><a title="mailto:rockrap@aol.com" href="mailto:rockrap@aol.com" target="_blank">rockrap@aol.com</a>.</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>T</strong></em><em><strong>he massive South by Southwest music festival (SXSW) has been held in Austin, Texas in the spring of every year since 1987. Dave Marsh reports on this year’s shindig.</strong></em><em><strong></strong></em></p>
<p><strong>I know something about SXSW keynote addresses. Little Richard and Smokey Robinson both did theirs as, in part, dialogues with me—sitting live in front of several hundred people, Richard being Richard, Smokey being serious, sincere, smart, and as handsome as seventy will allow. </strong></p>
<p><strong>T</strong><strong>o a certain extent, it’s a setup: All the attendees who don’t care find other things to do and most of the rest come to have expectations affirmed. But it’s not that simple either. I had the best fun of the last twenty years just asking four questions, sitting and watching Little Richard rave for (I timed it) 17 and a half minutes without pausing for breath. Then he turned to me, clearly winded, and said breathlessly, “Ohhh, Dave! You’re still here. I bet you want to ask me some more questions.” </strong><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>But it’s not that simple either. The best moments can also be absolutely pedagogical: Smokey ended with a seven minute spiel telling people how to find and deal with stardom, beginning with an admonition (“Thicken your skin”) and ending with a parable about the invention of show business. Since 2010 that last part’s gotten almost half a million hits on YouTube. Richard, who appeared in ’08, seemed to just rant but in reality he was preaching a sermon on the same theme as Smokey, offering all kinds of nuggets but coming back to the main point over and over again: “Sign your own checks!&#8230;Sign your own checks!” Afterwards, a young woman came up to me, eyes a brimful of tears, and said, “Thank you, thank you, that was everything I came here to learn.” </strong></p>
<p><strong>Steve Earle began by lecturing his audience: “Let me make something extremely clear. Kiss is not cool, Kiss was never cool, Kiss will never be cool.” </strong></p>
<p><strong>But Bruce Springsteen, this year, was something else again. He offered career advice wrapped in biography, history complete with instructive examples of where he’d swiped a couple of his classics: the doo-wop crooning that led to “Backstreets,” the way the Animals’ “Don’t Let Me Be Misunderstood” provided the core of “Badlands,” and how and why “We Gotta Get Out of This Place” is “every song I’ve ever written including the new ones.” Rocker he may be, but not rockist: “The elements you&#8217;re using don&#8217;t matter. Purity of human expression and experience is not confined to guitars, to tubes, to turntables, to microchips. There is no right way, no pure way, of doing it. There&#8217;s just doing it.” Bruce wrestled with Lester Bangs and Woody Guthrie, post-authenticity, the transformative self, Roy Orbison’s paranoia, Phil Spector’s musical violence, the cover of </strong><em><strong>Meet the Beatles</strong></em><strong> as “the silent gods of Olympus,” the barely comprehensible existence of Nintendo-core, black death metal, and the yearning needs of soul. It was as if someone had managed to translate “A wop bop a loo bop a wop bam boom tutti frutti” into a comprehensive treatise on the development and meaning (or lack thereof) of the past sixty years of Anglo-American popular music. </strong></p>
<p><strong>He avoided the hard political realities at the core of his new album, </strong><em><strong>Wrecking Ball</strong></em><strong>, in favor of talking eye to eye with an audience he assumed (correctly) consisted of people who either knew these things or needed to find them out. It was a practical speech, aimed at a specific group of people. He didn’t even know it was being broadcast live or, as far as I can tell, imagine that it would wind up all over the Internet, words stuck in the heads of millions of listeners. (The full audio’s at <a title="http://npr.org/" href="http://npr.org" target="_blank">npr.org</a>. It’s also worth looking at the segments posted on YouTube, particularly the stuff about the Animals.) </strong></p>
<p><strong>Raves arrived immediately, but I don’t think anyone’s used the term that best describes it for me: Generosity. The speech gave far more than it took and it held back on self-promotion (granted that the entire speech was wrapped in Bruce’s persona, but I’ve already quoted the only reference to his new album.) </strong></p>
<p><strong>Springsteen never has opening acts. That day he had five. Before the SXSW speech, Jimmy LaFave, Eliza Gilkyson, and Juanes sang Woody Guthrie songs (plus one original by Juanes). It was beautiful and loving, and all the things that a tribute to a great artist on his centenary ought to be. The highlight for me wasn’t Juanes singing a verse from “This Land Is Your Land,” which he told me later was the first time he’d ever sung in English onstage, but Juanes stepping up to challenge the audience when it didn’t sing along heartily enough. LaFave sang wonderfully as he always does, his Oklahoma roots deliberately on display, and his commentary on Woody’s music and life more trenchant than ever. And Eliza, firebrand that she is, kept the music contemporary, insisting on its relevance—or rather, insisting on her listeners paying attention to its continuing relation to the world descended from the one Guthrie described. Eliza has been the best female singer-songwriter for several years now, LaFave has been the best interpreter of Guthrie, Dylan and Springsteen for longer than that, and maybe this performance will help the news spread from Austin. Juanes, of course, is a rock star of Springsteen’s magnitude throughout Latin America and much of Europe; imagine John Lennon in Spanish. </strong></p>
<p><strong>T</strong><strong>hat evening at the Moody Theater Springsteen had two openers&#8211;Low Anthem and Alejandro Escovedo with his full band each did about 45 minutes. (Springsteen had done a couple of numbers with Alejandro the night before at the Austin Music Awards show.) </strong><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>T</strong><strong>he Austin show was only Springsteen’s second since the release of </strong><em><strong>Wrecking Ball</strong></em><strong> and, like its predecessor—an Apollo Theater benefit in honor of SiriusXM’s tenth anniversary—it contained some beautiful one-off wrinkles. Instead of invoking Curtis Mayfield, Wilson Pickett and Smokey Robinson (and James Brown by way of a lunatic climb into the rigging), this time Woody Guthrie framed the action. Bruce opened with his now-17 member E Street Band doing “I Ain’t Got No Home” a cappella and closed with “This Land is Your Land” with Escovedo, Low Anthem, Joe Ely, and a couple members of Arcade Fire helping out. </strong><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Is there another performer in our culture who operates in both the folk-rock and soul-gospel traditions? It’s as fashionable lately to evoke Springsteen as a literary figure as it once was to display him as an articulate pseudo-gas station attendant. But what’s most remarkable is the ability to move smoothly among soul and gospel music and the folk and country tradition in the way that Springsteen does. He has reached the point now that on </strong><em><strong>Wrecking Ball</strong></em><strong>’s “Land of Hope and Dreams” he does both in the same song. Generally, one is lurking in the background of the other in any of his songs, especially live. (Which can’t be discerned if all your attention is on the lyrics which is where, I suppose, the shade of the Great American Poem lurks in the minds of the critics who think it’s mostly about the words.) Yet in pulling these sounds together, Springsteen is capable of convincing more than a few that the beloved community truly could be in our future. </strong></p>
<p><strong>T</strong><strong>he </strong><em><strong>Wrecking Ball</strong></em><strong> songs (at the Moody he played eight of the eleven) have the strongest connecting thread of any Springsteen album since </strong><em><strong>T</strong></em><em><strong>he River</strong></em><strong>&#8211;from the furious social questions of “We Take Care of Our Own,” through the economic despair and determination of “Jack of All Trades” and “Death to My Hometown” to the glorious anthem of hope “Rocky Ground”—with its invocation of God, who does not answer—to the final, unambiguous call to action, “We Are Alive.” </strong><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>I don’t suppose Bruce Springsteen has a much clearer vision of where, exactly, that action must lead to prevent the “hard times come and hard times go” cycle that he pounds away at six consecutive times in the song “Wrecking Ball.” But you can glimpse what it might feel like in any great musical performance, not just one of his. And, from my perspective, that is the real purpose of SXSW. Truth is, there hasn’t been a commercially important act that broke out of the conference since Hanson, fifteen years ago. But so what? It’s still the biggest, best music school in the United States, maybe the world. </strong></p>
<p><strong>And while Bruce’s show couldn’t offer the kind of community that he evokes in songs like “Land of Hope and Dreams,” it did evoke a sense of musician solidarity that’s essential to what happens with SXSW at its best. It’s a glimpse, but even a full-on Bruce and the E Street Band show is just a glimpse of what it would be like to live with equality and justice every day. </strong></p>
<p><strong>SXSW is as imperfect as any other human project. The sheer size of it has outstripped Austin’s transportation infrastructure and its deficit is ever-widening. The business panels are just the record industry trying to talk itself into believing it still exists. Hip-hop, dance, and ethnic music never get an equal shot in the press coverage and Austin’s local Mexican/Chicano community is invisible. </strong></p>
<p><strong>But. </strong></p>
<p><strong>What SXSW offers is a chance to attend that music school not only as student but as teacher. Not to study music but to observe and participate in the stewing mess of it. I have gone to Austin for this peculiar rite of March madness for the past, I think, nineteen years. I went to speak, I went back to listen. I keep going back not because I think I’m going to find any next big thing, but because I might run into musical glory.</strong></p>
<p><strong>T</strong><strong>his year, I got it in half a dozen ways—from Bruce, of course, but also from Eric Burdon, whose surprise (even to him and Springsteen) appearance to sing “We Gotta Get Out of This Place” at the Moody was a fiery proof of every accolade heaped upon the Animals’ frontman earlier that day. Where else could I interview, in the space of forty-eight hours both Juanes and Eric Burdon? Where else could I see old Austin friends like LaFave, Gilkyson, Michael Ramos, Michael Fracasso, Joe Ely and the Krayolas? Where else could I spend an afternoon and evening at a taqueria with Alejandro, Jesse Malin, Lenny Kaye, Rosie Flores, and new favorites like Maren Parusel? </strong><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Where else could I (with massive help from David Alvarez at KUT-FM and my producer Jim Rotolo) put on a live Sunday radio show, from nine to eleven AM, with seven musical guests? None of them played a record or sang a song I’d ever heard before. And all of them were flat-out great. None of them got paid—at SXSW no artist at an official gig ever gets paid, and very few get paid at any of the others, either. It is, most of the time, music for the love of music. </strong></p>
<p><strong>I go to SXSW to recharge, to remember why I love music, why we’ve still got a chance. And this year, like that young woman said, I got everything I came to learn.—D.M.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Please forward this RRC Extra to five friends. To subscribe to Rock &amp; Rap Confidential, just email </strong><strong><a title="mailto:rockrap@aol.com" href="mailto:rockrap@aol.com" target="_blank">rockrap@aol.com</a></strong><strong>. Subscriptions are free.</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davemarsh.us/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1002</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making Sense of Ron Paul (courtesy of Tim Wise)</title>
		<link>http://davemarsh.us/?p=993</link>
		<comments>http://davemarsh.us/?p=993#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 18:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Republican candidates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kevin Gray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Wise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white supremacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemarsh.us/?p=993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article originally appeared at the website of Tim Wise, who wrote it. It appears here with the permission of Wise, but you would do well to connect to the original page: http://www.timwise.org/2012/01/of-broken-clocks-presidential-candidates-and-the-confusion-of-certain-white-liberals/ Tim Wise is the outstanding white opponent of racism and white supremacy in the United States today. The connections he makes here [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>This article originally appeared at the website of Tim Wise, who wrote it. It appears here with the permission of Wise, but you would do well to connect to the original page: </strong><br />
<strong><a title="http://www.timwise.org/2012/01/of-broken-clocks-presidential-candidates-and-the-confusion-of-certain-white-liberals/" href="http://www.timwise.org/2012/01/of-broken-clocks-presidential-candidates-and-the-confusion-of-certain-white-liberals/">http://www.timwise.org/2012/01/of-broken-clocks-presidential-candidates-and-the-confusion-of-certain-white-liberals/</a> Tim Wise is the outstanding white opponent of racism and white supremacy in the United States today. The connections he makes here go beyond those issues but inevitably connect back to them. </strong></p>
<p><strong>I would also urge you to read Wise&#8217;s books, particularly the new one, Dear White America: Letter to a New Minority (City Lights). It is a toolbox for critically examining white privilege, the delusions of the Tea Party and our national blindness and ignorance about how our system of ethnic discrimination works. I would summarize Wise&#8217;s point this way: The racial dilemma of the United States can only be solved by increasing white people&#8217;s awareness of the various ways they are able to take advantage of our social, cultural and economic resources, why this comes at the expense of non-whites, how most whites are themselves held back by this system, and the central role that whites <span style="text-decoration: underline;">must </span>play in any positive resolution. </strong></p>
<p><strong>If I were still a parent of young children, I&#8217;d want each of my kids to have her own copy and probably would distribute a few to their teachers too. And nobody who sees racism as a peripheral or nonexistent issue in this year&#8217;s elections ought to allow himself anywhere near a voting booth until he&#8217;s absorbed the meesages in Dear White America and this essay. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Thanks to Tim Wise, not only for helping others fight the internalized evils of white supremacy but for helping, me.&#8211; Dave </strong></p>
<p><strong><a title="http://www.timwise.org/2012/01/of-broken-clocks-presidential-candidates-and-the-confusion-of-certain-white-liberals/ Of Broken Clocks, Presidential Candidates,         and the Confusion of Certain White Liberals" href="http://www.timwise.org/2012/01/of-broken-clocks-presidential-candidates-and-the-confusion-of-certain-white-liberals/" rel="bookmark">Of Broken Clocks, Presidential Candidates, and the Confusion of Certain White Liberals</a></strong></p>
<p><strong>Posted on January 12, 2012</strong></p>
<p><strong><em>This  commentary is rated MA for mature audiences. It contains some foul language, although honestly, only so much as is needed to get the damned point across. Parental discretion is advised…</em></strong></p>
<div>
<p><strong>Attention </strong><strong>to all self-proclaimed liberals and progressives.</strong></p>
<p><strong>I </strong><strong>would like to properly introduce you to a man about whom you’ve heard much — </strong><strong>especially from his enemies and those who prefer a continuation of the status </strong><strong>quo — but at whom you might wish to take a second look, and whom you might </strong><strong>consider supporting for president.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Unlike </strong><strong>Barack Obama, he supports an <em>immediate</em> end to our current and ongoing wars </strong><strong>abroad.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Unlike </strong><strong>Barack Obama, he supports an end to predator drone attacks by the United States </strong><strong>military, which kill innocent civilians and foment growing hatred of America. He </strong><strong>believes that the so-called “war on terror” as we’ve engaged it has undermined </strong><strong>American freedoms at home and contributed to greater tensions and anti-American </strong><strong>sentiment abroad.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Unlike </strong><strong>Barack Obama, he supports an entirely revamped Middle East policy, in which the </strong><strong>U.S. will no longer subsidize the oppression of the Palestinian people by the </strong><strong>state of Israel. </strong><strong>Unlike </strong><strong>Barack Obama, he supports either abolishing or fundamentally reforming the </strong><strong>Federal Reserve system, and he opposed bailing out the banks with public </strong><strong>funds.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Unlike </strong><strong>Barack Obama, this individual opposes government spying and believes in absolute </strong><strong>freedom of speech and the press, and as he puts it, “reduced government </strong><strong>intrusion into our lives.”</strong></p>
<p><strong>Clearly, </strong><strong>with such a progressive vision, no one of the left would want to pass up the </strong><strong>opportunity to support a candidate such as this for president! Surely it would </strong><strong>be a vast improvement over Barack Obama, that Wall Street- friendly, </strong><strong>imperialistic, war-monger, who promised to close Guantanamo but didn’t, among </strong><strong>other unforgivable crimes. </strong><strong>So </strong><strong>by all means, let’s get behind someone who will close down the national security </strong><strong>state, stand up for civil liberties, and stop handing out money to bankers. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Ladies </strong><strong>and Gentlemen of the left, I give you your perfect candidate for 2012: </strong><strong>David </strong><strong>Duke.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Oh </strong><strong>I’m sorry, did you think I was talking about someone <em>else</em>? </strong><strong>Yes, <em>that</em> David Duke: former head of the nation’s </strong><strong>largest Ku Klux Klan group and lifelong neo-Nazi, who once said Jews should go </strong><strong>into the ashbin of history, and that it would be possible to do what Hitler did, </strong><strong>even in America, if white supremacists could just “put the right package </strong><strong>together.”</strong></p>
<p><strong>But </strong><strong>ya know that whole racist thing doesn’t matter, right? Because he’s against <em>wiretapping</em>. </strong><strong>I </strong><strong>mean, yeah, he <em>has</em> analogized Jews to cancer, has called for </strong><strong>the partition of the United States into distinct racial sub-nations, and </strong><strong>believes in a eugenics program to create an Aryan master race. But who cares? </strong><strong>Because he’s against the Patriot Act.</strong></p>
<p><strong>And </strong><strong>hey, I mean, let’s be real, none of that really awful stuff he believes in — ya </strong><strong>know, like the racial sub-nations, or the eugenics, or the sterilization of </strong><strong>welfare recipients, or the whole Hitler-in-America thing, could really <em>happen</em>. </strong><strong>I mean, Congress would never agree to all <em>that</em> stuff. So the fact that Duke believes so </strong><strong>many truly horrible, inexcusable, thoroughly fucked up, one might even say <em>evil</em> things, shouldn’t deter us from praising </strong><strong>him, or even supporting him for president. We <em>have</em> to stop Obama: that spineless coward who </strong><br />
<strong>didn’t stand up for single-payer. And no, Duke wouldn’t support single payer </strong><strong>either. But so what? At least <em>he’d</em> tell the TSA to back off with their whole </strong><strong>nudie-picture-body-scans-at-the-airport thing. And <em>that’s</em> what <em>really</em> matters.</strong></p>
<p><strong>And </strong><strong>he’d end that Iraq war. Yes, I know, it’s already ending, but he’d end it <em>faster</em>. </strong><strong>Like <em>tomorrow</em>. </strong><strong>Because ya know, that’s <em>possible</em>: </strong><strong>A president can just snap his fingers and poof! The troops all suddenly appear </strong><strong>at Andrews Air Force base! It’s fucking <em>magic</em>!</strong></p>
<p><strong>And </strong><strong>he’d shut down the Fed! <em>Woo-hoo!</em> That would be <em>awesome</em>: </strong><strong>so then interest rates and the money supply could be controlled <em>entirely</em> by private banks, without even a theoretical </strong><strong>modicum of public accountability! What progressive <em>wouldn’t</em> love that? And sure, the Fed was created by </strong><strong>an act of Congress, but that doesn’t matter: a president with the determination </strong><strong>of David Duke can just snap his fingers and poof! All the central bankers will </strong><strong>be begging on the streets for change! Like I said, it’s fucking <em>magic</em>!</strong></p>
<p><strong>So </strong><strong>yes, he may want to abolish all welfare programs for the poor; and he may want </strong><strong>to crack down on immigrants who are trying to make their lives better, by </strong><strong>repealing birthright citizenship as guaranteed in the Fourteenth Amendment and </strong><strong>militarizing the border; and he might want to repeal <em>Roe v. Wade</em>, by way of a constitutional amendment that would grant full </strong><strong>personhood status to zygotes, thereby limiting the reproductive freedom of </strong><strong>women; and he may want to slash taxes on the rich, and give tax breaks to </strong><strong>parents who want to homeschool their kids and perhaps teach them that dinosaurs </strong><strong>and humans co-existed, but <em>who<br />
cares</em>? He’s a straight-shooter who stands on principle and will shake up </strong><strong>the system and break the political stranglehold exercised currently by the </strong><strong>approved establishment candidates. Take<em>t hat</em>! <em>Zip-Zow!</em></strong></p>
<p><strong>Alright, </strong><strong>enough. Can we just cut the crap?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Even </strong><strong>a broken clock is right twice a day, and even the most retrograde political </strong><strong>candidates are capable of stringing together a few ideas that make sense. Even </strong><strong>David “The Holocaust was made up by some Jewish script writer in Hollywood,” </strong><strong>Duke.</strong></p>
<p><strong>And </strong><strong>yes, I realize that Ron Paul — this election season’s physical embodiment of the </strong><strong>broken clock — is not, literally, as bad as David Duke. Yes, he supports all </strong><strong>those incredibly ass-backwards policies rattled off above (about welfare, </strong><strong>immigration, abortion, taxes and education), but he is not, like Duke, a Nazi. </strong><strong>He <em>is</em> supported by Nazis, <a title="http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/12/28/founder-of-stormfront-openly-endorses-ron-paul-says-paul-shares-their-views-video/" href="http://www.addictinginfo.org/2011/12/28/founder-of-stormfront-openly-endorses-ron-paul-says-paul-shares-their-views-video/">like Stormfront</a> — the nation’s largest </strong><strong>white nationalist outfit, which is led by Don Black, who’s one of Duke’s best </strong><strong>friends, and is married to Duke’s ex-wife, and is Duke’s daughters’ step-dad — </strong><strong>but I’m sure that’s just a coincidence. Surely it’s not because Paul wants to </strong><strong>repeal the Civil Rights Act and the Fair Housing Act, and allow companies to </strong><strong>discriminate in the name of “free association.” And it couldn’t have anything to </strong><br />
<strong>do with those newsletters that went out under his name, with all kinds of </strong><strong>blatantly bigoted commentary about black people being IQ-deficient predators, at </strong><strong>a time when he was promoting those very newsletters (and so, presumably, <em>reading</em> them), and not objecting in the least.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Yet </strong><strong>to the so-called progressives who sing the praises of Ron Paul, all because of </strong><strong>his views on domestic spying, bailouts for banksters, and military intervention </strong><strong>abroad, the fact that 90 percent of his political platform is right-wing </strong><strong>boilerplate about slashing taxes on the rich, slashing programs for the poor and </strong><strong>working class, breaking unions, drilling for oil anywhere and everywhere, and </strong><strong>privatizing everything from retirement programs to health care doesn’t matter: </strong><strong>the fact that he’ll ostensibly <em>legalize drugs</em> is enough. And this is so, </strong><br />
<strong>even though he has merely said he would leave drug laws <a title="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/01/07/1052487/-Ron-Paul:-No-Liberal?via=search" href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/01/07/1052487/-Ron-Paul:-No-Liberal?via=search">up to the states</a> (which means 49 </strong><strong>separate drug wars, everywhere except maybe Vermont, so ya know, congrats </strong><strong>hippies!), and he would oppose spending public money on drug rehab or education, </strong><strong>both of which you’d need more of if drugs <em>were</em> legalized, but why let little details </strong><strong>like <em>that</em> bother you?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Yessir, </strong><strong>legal weed and an end to the TSA: enough to make some supposed leftists ignore </strong><strong>everything else Ron Paul has ever said, and ignore the fundamental </strong><strong>incompatibility of Ayn Randian thinking with anything remotely resembling a </strong><strong>progressive or even humane worldview. And this is so, even though he wouldn’t </strong><br />
<strong>actually have the authority to end the TSA as president, a slight glitch that is </strong><strong>conveniently ignored by those who are desperate to once again be able to take </strong><strong>large bottles of shaving gel onto airplanes in the name of “liberty.”</strong></p>
<p><strong>I </strong><strong>want those of you who are seriously singing Paul’s praises, while calling </strong><strong>yourself progressive or left to ask what it signifies — not about Ron Paul, but </strong><strong>about <em>you</em> — that you can look the rest of us in the </strong><strong>eye, your political colleagues and allies, and say, in effect, “Well, he might </strong><strong>be a little racist, <em>but</em>…</strong></p>
<p><strong>How </strong><strong>do you think that sounds to black people, without whom no remotely progressive </strong><strong>candidate stands a chance of winning shit in this country at a national level? </strong><strong>How does it sound to <em>them</em> — a group that has been more loyal to </strong><strong>progressive and left politics than any group in this country — when you praise a </strong><strong>man who opposes probably the single most important piece of legislation ever </strong><strong>passed in this country, and whose position on the right of businesses to </strong><strong>discriminate, places him on the side of the segregated lunchcounter owners? And </strong><strong>how do you think they take it that you praise this man, or possibly even support </strong><strong>him for president, all so as to teach the <em>black guy</em> currently in the office a </strong><strong>lesson for failing to live up to your expectations?</strong></p>
<p><strong>How </strong><strong>do you think it sounds to them, right now, this week, as we prepare to mark the </strong><strong>Martin Luther King Jr. holiday, that you claim to be progressive, and yet you </strong><strong>are praising or even encouraging support for a man who <a title="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/01/mlk-day-fact-check/251037/" href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/01/mlk-day-fact-check/251037/">voted against that holiday</a>, who opposes almost every aspect of King’s public </strong><strong>policy agenda, and the crowning achievements of the movement he helped lead?</strong></p>
<p><strong>My </strong><strong>guess is that you don’t think about this <em>at all</em>. Because you don’t have to. <em>One guess</em> as to why not.</strong></p>
<p><strong>It’s </strong><strong>the same reason you don’t have to think about how it sounds to most women — and </strong><strong>damned near all progressive women — when you praise Paul openly despite his </strong><strong>views on reproductive freedom, and even sexual harassment, which Paul has </strong><strong>said <a title="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/275198/20120102/ron-paul-laws-against-sexual-harassment-s.htm" href="http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/275198/20120102/ron-paul-laws-against-sexual-harassment-s.htm">should not even be an issue</a> for the </strong><strong>courts. He thinks women who are harassed on the job should just quit. In other </strong><strong>words, “Yeah, he might be a little bit sexist, but…”</strong></p>
<p><strong>It’s </strong><strong>the same reason you don’t have to really sweat the fact that he would love to </strong><strong>cut important social programs for poor people. And you don’t have to worry about </strong><strong>how it sounds to them that you would claim to be progressive, while encouraging </strong><strong>support for a guy who would pull what minimal safety net still exists from under </strong><strong>them, and leave it to private charities to fill the gap. And we all know why you </strong><strong>don’t have to worry about it. Because you aren’t <em>them</em>. </strong><strong>You aren’t the ones who would be affected. You’ll <em>never</em> be them. I doubt you even <em>know</em> anyone like that. People who are that poor </strong><strong>don’t follow you on Twitter.</strong></p>
<p><strong>There </strong><strong>is a reason why Ron Paul rallies, and the street-corner Paul-supporting </strong><strong>pseudo-flash mobs are overwhelmingly, disproportionately comprised of white, </strong><strong>middle class men. And it matters. Surely it is not because white, middle class </strong><strong>men are more likely than others to oppose war, torture, drone killings of Muslim </strong><br />
<strong>children, or bailouts of rich bankers. It is not because white, middle class men </strong><strong>are more progressive when it comes to civil liberties than women, poor people or </strong><strong>folks of color. Indeed, the opposite is true.</strong></p>
<p><strong>I’ve </strong><strong>talked with them on numerous occasions, these Paul devotees, with their “Who is </strong><strong>John Galt?” signs, with their 20-minute spiels about why it’s so important to </strong><strong>invest in gold, and whispered assurances that “they” will never tell you the </strong><strong>truth about the Illuminati, or the Rothschilds, or the Bilderbergers, or <a title="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201201050012" href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201201050012">Tower 7</a>, or vitamin </strong><br />
<strong>supplements. They <em>never</em> talk about the institutional racism at the </strong><strong>heart of the drug war. They never talk about how we need to rethink the war on </strong><strong>terror (except insofar as it inconveniences <em>them</em> to be body scanned at the airport, when </strong><strong>everyone <em>knows</em>, </strong><strong>we should just be checking brown-skinned men in turbans). These guys are largely </strong><strong>attracted to Paul because he’ll get government off <em>their</em> backs, by lowering their taxes, cutting </strong><br />
<strong>spending that helps poor people whom they regard as lazy, ending the </strong><strong>“suffocating” regulations that they believe stifle innovation, and vouchsafing </strong><strong>their God-given right to own any and all manner of assault rifle they desire, </strong><strong>the latter of which they simply “know” President Obama is going to forcibly </strong><strong>confiscate, along with their handguns, rifles, and maybe even Super-Soakers any </strong><strong>day now.</strong></p>
<p><strong>In </strong><strong>short, regardless of what Paul may believe on certain issues, and which may fall </strong><strong>squarely in the orbit of that which is progressive or left, his hard-core </strong><strong>acolytes (and the ones who would be empowered most by his success) are </strong><strong>anything <em>but</em> that. They want the government to stop </strong><strong>taking <em>their</em> tax dollars and “giving them” to Mexicans </strong><strong>and blacks, or anyone of any race or ethnicity who in their mind isn’t smart </strong><strong>enough or hard working enough to have their own private health care. They don’t </strong><strong>want the government to help homeowners who got roped into predatory loans by </strong><strong>banks and independent mortgage brokers: instead they blame the homeowners for </strong><strong>not being savvy enough borrowers, or they blame government regulation for </strong><strong>ostensibly “forcing” lenders to finance housing for minorities and poor people </strong><strong>who didn’t deserve it.</strong></p>
<p><strong>And </strong><strong>no, you can’t separate the man from his movement, so don’t even try. </strong><strong>When </strong><strong>you support or give credence to a candidate, you indirectly empower that </strong><strong>candidate’s worldview and others who hold fast to it. So when you support or </strong><strong>even substantively praise Ron Paul, you are empowering libertarianism, and its </strong><strong>offshoots like Ayn Rand’s “greed is good” objectivism, and all those who believe </strong><strong>in it. You are empowering the fans of <em>The<br />
Fountainhead</em> and <em>Atlas Shrugged</em>, in which books they learn that altruism is immoral, and that only </strong><strong>the self matters. You are empowering the reactionary, white supremacist, Social </strong><strong>Darwinists of this culture, who believe — <em>as does Ron Paul</em> — that that </strong><strong>Greensboro Woolworth’s was <em>right</em>, </strong><strong>and that the police who dragged sit-in protesters off soda fountain stools for </strong><strong>trespassing on a white man’s property were <em>justified</em> in doing so, and that the freedom of </strong><strong>department store owners to refuse to let black people try on clothes in their </strong><strong>dressing rooms was more sacrosanct than the right of black people to be treated </strong><strong>like human beings.</strong></p>
<p><strong>See, </strong><strong>believe it or not, judgment matters. If a man believes there is a straight line </strong><strong>of unbroken tyranny betwixt the torture and indefinite detention of suspected </strong><strong>terrorists on the one hand, and anti-discrimination laws that seek to extend to </strong><strong>all persons equal opportunity, on the other, that man is a lunatic. Worse than a </strong><strong>lunatic, that man is a person of such extraordinarily obtuse philosophical and </strong><strong>moral discernment as to call into real question whether he should even be </strong><strong>allowed to go through life absent the protective and custodial assistance of a </strong><strong>straightjacket, let alone hold office. That one might believe in unicorns would </strong><strong>still allow one to profess a level of sagacity and synaptic activity in one’s </strong><strong>brain several measures beyond that of the man who thinks liberty is equally </strong><strong>imperiled by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as by the CIA.</strong></p>
<p><strong>That </strong><strong>any liberal, progressive or leftist could waste so much as a kind word about </strong><strong>someone as this is mind-boggling. There are not many litmus tests for being a </strong><strong>progressive in good standing in this country, but one would think, if there </strong><strong>were, that surely to God, civil rights would be one of them. It is one thing to </strong><strong>disagree about the proper level of taxation, either on the wealthy or </strong><strong>corporations: honest people can disagree about that, and for reasons that would </strong><strong>still permit one to claim the mantle of liberalism or progressivism; so too with </strong><strong>defense spending, drug policy, trade, education reform, energy policy, and any </strong><strong>number of other things. But the notion that one can be a progressive, even </strong><strong>merely liberal, while praising someone who believes that companies should be </strong><strong>allowed to post “No Blacks Need Apply” signs if they wish, and that only the </strong><strong>market should determine whether that kind of bigotry will stand, is so </strong><strong>stupefying that it should render even the most cynical of us utterly bereft of </strong><strong>words. It is, or should be, a deal-breaker among decent people. </strong></p>
<p><strong>And </strong><strong>please, Glenn Greenwald, spare me the <a title="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/democratic_party_priorities/singleton/" href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/democratic_party_priorities/singleton/">tired shtick</a> about how Paul “raises </strong><strong>important issues” that no one on the left is raising, and so even though you’re </strong><strong>not endorsing him, it is still helpful to a progressive narrative that his voice </strong><strong>be heard. Bullshit. The stronger Paul gets the stronger Paul gets, period. And </strong><strong>the stronger Paul gets, the stronger libertarianism gets, and thus, the </strong><strong>Libertarian Party as a potential third party: not the Greens, mind you, but the </strong><strong>Libertarians. And the stronger Paul gets, the stronger become those voices who </strong><strong>worship the free market as though it were an invisible fairy godparent, capable </strong><strong>of dispensing all good things </strong><strong>to all comers — people like Paul Ryan, for </strong><strong>instance, or Scott Walker. In a nation where the dominant narrative has long </strong><strong>been anti-tax, anti-regulation, poor-people-bashing and God-bless-capitalism, it </strong><strong>would be precisely <em>those</em> aspects of Paul’s ideological grab bag that </strong><strong>would become more prominent. And if you don’t <em>know</em> that, you are a fool of such Herculean </strong><strong>proportions as to suggest that <em>Salon</em> might wish to consider administering some </strong><strong>kind of political-movement-related-cognitive skills test for its columnists, and </strong><strong>the setting of a minimum cutoff score, below which you would, for this one </strong><strong>stroke of asininity alone, most assuredly fall.</strong></p>
<p><strong>I </strong><strong>mean, seriously, if “raising important issues” is all it takes to get some kind </strong><strong>words from liberal authors, bloggers and activists, and maybe even votes from </strong><strong>some progressives, just so as to “shake things up,” then why not support David </strong><strong>Duke? With the exception of his views on the drug war, David shares every single </strong><strong>view of Paul’s that can be considered progressive or left in orientation. <em>Every single one</em>. So where do you draw the line? Must one have actually donned a </strong><strong>Klan hood and lit a cross before his handful of liberal stands prove to be </strong><strong>insufficient? Must one actually, as Duke has been known to do, light candles on </strong><strong>a birthday cake for Hitler on April 20, before it no longer proves adequate to </strong><strong>want to limit the overzealous reach of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and </strong><strong>Firearms? Exactly when does one become too much of an evil fuck even for <em>you</em>? </strong><strong>Inquiring minds seriously want to know.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Meanwhile, </strong><strong>at what point do you stop being so concerned about whether a presidential </strong><strong>candidate is pushing the issues Paul raises (so many of which <em>do</em> need raising and attention), and realize </strong><strong>what every actual leftist in history has realized, but which apparently some </strong><strong>liberals and progressives don’t: namely, that the real battles are in the </strong><strong>streets, and in the neighborhoods, and in movement activism? It isn’t a </strong><strong>president, whether his name is Ron Paul or Barack Obama who gets good things </strong><strong>done. It is <em>us</em>, </strong><strong>demanding change and threatening to literally shut the system down (whether we </strong><strong>mean Wall Street, the Port of Oakland, the Wisconsin state capitol, Columbia </strong><strong>University, a Woolworth’s lunch counter, or the Montgomery, Alabama bus system) </strong><strong>who <em>force</em> presidents and lawmakers to bend to the </strong><strong>public will.</strong></p>
<p><strong>In </strong><strong>short, if you’re still disappointed in Barack Obama, it’s only because you never </strong><strong>understood whose job it was to produce change in the first place. But don’t take </strong><strong>out your own failings in this regard on the rest of us, by giving ideological </strong><strong>cover and assorted journalistic love taps to a guy who believes the poor should </strong><strong>rely on the <a title="http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/health-care/" href="http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/health-care/">charitable impulses of doctors</a> to provide for their </strong><strong>medical needs, including, one presumes, chemotherapy; or that America was meant </strong><strong>to be a <a title="http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul148.html" href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul148.html">“robustly Christian”</a> nation, but is being </strong><strong>currently undermined by “secularists;” or who puts the term gay rights <a title="http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul120.html" href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul120.html">in quotation marks</a> when he writes it, and believes states </strong><strong>should be free to criminalize homosexual intercourse, and who is such a </strong><strong>homophobe that he won’t even <a title="http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/12/27/Former_Aide_Says_Ron_Paul_Uncomfortable_Using_Gay_Bathroom/" href="http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/12/27/Former_Aide_Says_Ron_Paul_Uncomfortable_Using_Gay_Bathroom/">use the bathroom</a> in a gay man’s house; </strong><strong>or who has all but said that he would like to take America back to the <em>early<br />
1800s</em>, in terms of the scope of government: a truly glorious time to be </strong><strong>sure, if you were white, male and owned property.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Ya </strong><strong>know, like some of the liberal “thinkers” who have, as of late, decided to </strong><strong>praise Ron Paul.</strong></p>
</div>
<p><strong>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</strong></p>
<p><strong>P.S. I must add that I radically diverge here from the position of my close friend Kevin Gray on whether Ron Paul can be a useful tool in open primaries for expressing disdain for the more popular Republican contenders as well as raising some of the issues listed below (which need to be raised by somebody and certainly will not be by Barack Obama). I&#8217;ve never lived in an open primary state, I&#8217;m white not black&#8230;there are a lot of reasons why Kevin and I see this differently. We have been arguing it out for the last several weeks on <em>Live from the Land of Hope and Dreams </em>(SiriusXM Left, channel 127, Sundays 1-4 PM Eastern). I certainly don&#8217;t agree that there is no reason to be disappointed in Barack Obama, although I suspect that both Kevin and I are disappointed in the response of Obama&#8217;s voting constituency in failing to oppose his abandonment of too many issues he promised he&#8217;d help out with during the &#8217;08 campaign. But I also know that I share with Kevin agreement that we don&#8217;t need better candidates so much as we need more active, determined citizens waging a battle against a corrupt system outside the polling places. Maybe Kevin will drop in at this site with some expression of his own reasoning.  &#8212; D.M. </strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davemarsh.us/?feed=rss2&#038;p=993</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Letter to My Daughter on the Nineteenth Anniversary of Her Death</title>
		<link>http://davemarsh.us/?p=987</link>
		<comments>http://davemarsh.us/?p=987#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Saying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children and cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kristen Ann Carr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kristen Carr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady GaGa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parents and cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemarsh.us/?p=987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Kristen, Can I tell you a secret? It’s ridiculous but I didn’t even know it was a secret until I heard Lady GaGa’s “Hair” this morning and then I realized that I’d kept it even from myself. In my ears, it’s a record where I always find you. “I’ve had enough, this is my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Kristen,</strong></p>
<p><strong>Can I tell you a secret? It’s ridiculous but I didn’t even </strong><strong>know it was a secret until I heard Lady GaGa’s “Hair” this morning and then </strong><strong>I realized that I’d kept it even from myself. In my ears, it’s a record where </strong><strong>I always find you. “I’ve had enough, this is my prayer / That I’ll die livin’ </strong><strong>just as free as my hair.” Those are the first song lyrics I’ve heard since “My </strong><strong>clothes don’t fit me no more” in “Streets of Philadelphia” that capture what you</strong><br />
<strong>dealt with in those long, brief months you fought your illness.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Now, Gaga’s not as cool as you. She </strong><strong>worries too much about being cool. You never worried about that—not as far as I </strong><strong>could tell, and I was watching pretty closely. Why would you? You walked into a </strong><strong>room and cool had arrived.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Nobody who </strong><strong>remembers you could forget your glorious hair—blonde or strawberry, somewhere </strong><strong>down around your shoulders or a little past, shimmering in motion, a glorious </strong><strong>sight on a sunny winter’s day like this one. It looked as free as you always </strong><strong>seemed to be feeling. Not free of worry or obligation. Free to be. </strong></p>
<p><strong>I know for a fact that cancer didn’t </strong><strong>take much from the life you lived. But once you started the all-but-useless</strong><br />
<strong>chemotherapy, it took your hair. <em>All </em>your </strong><strong>hair—not the way they do it in the movies and on TV, where they let the </strong><strong>eyebrows stay. Chemo and cancer aren’t that kind. </strong></p>
<p><strong>Even if I hadn’t been caught up in </strong><strong>the teenage hair wars of the ‘60s, I’d know that hair is a key to identity. I’d</strong><br />
<strong>know even if I hadn’t lost almost all my hair to age. What I remember, better than </strong><strong>my own stringy locks, is the first time I saw a chemotherapy patient after you </strong><strong>died. They looked just like you and I had to turn away. I’ve never turned away </strong><strong>since then, that I promise you. Because I would never, even symbolically, turn </strong><strong>away from your memory twice.</strong></p>
<p><strong>You lived beautifully without hair. </strong><strong>We have pictures to prove it. The spirit shone more brightly from your eyes, </strong><strong>your whole face was consumed with your conviction that life, not death, was </strong><strong>what mattered.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Every time </strong><strong>I write you, it always comes back to this same thing: The contradiction between </strong><strong>the failure of your fight for life, and the reality that your life cannot be </strong><strong>described  in any terms I know of, except </strong><strong>duration, as anything but a monumental success.  You loved, and you were loved, for that matter </strong><strong>you are still loved. You wrote, you danced, you sang, you worked, you slept </strong><strong>late, you stayed up all night, you traveled, you had a home and a family and a </strong><strong>man who loved you. When there was a fight, you figured out the right side to </strong><strong>take, and you fought. When there were questions, you sought answers. When you </strong><strong>saw that other people hurt, you tried to make them feel better.</strong><br />
<strong>As in anybody’s life, there were </strong><strong>fights that couldn’t be won, consolation that didn’t change anything, important </strong><strong>questions that lacked sensible answers, flat-out disappointments in some of </strong><strong>your ambitions. Eventually there was even betrayal by your own body. Yet you had </strong><strong>the courage and the grace to let it go, to move on, to come back to a center </strong><strong>point that was fundamentally cheerful, accepting, open. You were a child of Manhattan, without a </strong><strong>doubt, tough enough to cope with the worst and smart enough to try to outwit </strong><strong>fate without ever denying who held the cards. If you could be cynical (and, </strong><strong>boy, could you), you were the most optimistic cynic I ever met. </strong></p>
<p><strong>One reason I’m talking about this </strong><strong>now is that I am watching that spirit rise again. It never made itself entirely</strong><br />
<strong>absent from my life, of course. Like everybody, you were a product of the </strong><strong>family you grew up in, and if there’s anything that defines Barbara, Sasha and </strong><strong>me, it is absolutely an optimistic cynicism. We assume the worst and look for </strong><strong>the best. I’d say that we have done it better over the past nineteen years because </strong><strong>of the example you set, but then again, the example you set was only the most extreme </strong><strong>version of that family trait.</strong></p>
<p><strong>To me, the entire wonder of human life, </strong><strong>its majesty and its mystery, are bound up in this ability to share aspects of </strong><strong>our personality and yet arrive at a remarkably original individual synthesis—billions </strong><strong>of times over. You and Sasha, sleeping literally within a few feet of one </strong><strong>another most of the nights of your lives, are the paradigm, a similarity for </strong><strong>every difference, a contradiction for every convergence. One of the luckiest</strong><br />
<strong>aspects of my own existence was to watch the two of you emerge. One of the </strong><strong>happiest moments  was when Sasha returned </strong><strong>from abroad and the two of you harmonized so effortlessly those last few weeks. </strong><strong>And one of the most painful was watching Sasha have to learn the painful </strong><strong>process of living a complete life without her sister.</strong></p>
<p><strong>This year, she reached a new peak. </strong><strong>She became a mother. Her son’s name is Weston Kristof Carr.  He looks almost exactly like her, and yet, </strong><strong>they must be substantially different, because when she holds him and they look </strong><strong>into each other’s eyes, they are complete. You can imagine what happens when </strong><strong>Barbara and I hold him.</strong></p>
<p><strong>At Christmas dinner, Sasha watched </strong><strong>Wes at the table. He was doing what kids do, just immersed in his essential joy </strong><strong>of life. He must have been doing something particular, but the details really </strong><strong>aren’t important. What matters is what Sasha said: “Sometimes, you remind me an </strong><strong>awful lot of your aunt.”</strong></p>
<p><strong>After all this time, we all want </strong><strong>and need that reminder, Kristen. You are so far away, though you are always</strong><br />
<strong>close to mind. And heart. </strong></p>
<p><strong>I’d no sooner typed those words </strong><strong>than Sasha and Wes came into the house. (They live next door.) Wes gave me his </strong><strong>huge smile—it’ll show all his teeth, just like yours did, once he has all his </strong><strong>teeth. I walked over and picked him from his momma’s arms. “Are you writing?” </strong><strong>Sasha asked me after I’d held him for a few minutes. “Do you want me to take </strong><strong>him?” I didn’t say anything. “Yes and no, huh?” she said.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The heart is a muscle. It has an </strong><strong>amazing ability to expand—you may feel like your heart will burst with joy and</strong><br />
<strong>love but it never does. And when it contracts, it finds a way to fill itself </strong><strong>again. Each breath, in and out, a little different, a lot the same. If we’re </strong><strong>smart, we treasure them all, deep and small. And while my breaths continue, that </strong><strong>is the flat out truth, the one that really matters.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Not a lesson you ever seemed to </strong><strong>need. But I surely did. Thank you for teaching me the things that kids teach</strong><br />
<strong>their parents (and grandparents). We are so lucky to have Sasha and Wes in our </strong><strong>lives. We are—to this very second—so lucky to have you. </strong></p>
<p><strong>love from your Pop,</strong></p>
<p><strong>Dave</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davemarsh.us/?feed=rss2&#038;p=987</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>KICK OUT THE JAMS MOVES TO THE SPECTRUM (Channel 28) BEGINNING THIS SUNDAY, DEC. 4 2011</title>
		<link>http://davemarsh.us/?p=981</link>
		<comments>http://davemarsh.us/?p=981#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Saying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Marsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kick Out the Jams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sirius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SirusXM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Loft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Spectrum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemarsh.us/?p=981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Effective December 4, 2011, my Sunday morning SiriusXM program, Kick Out the Jams, which covers the world of music, with an emphasis on music and current events (or music and politics, if you prefer) moves from the Loft (channel 30) to The Spectrum (channel 28). The first show on The Spectrum will be the pre-recorded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Effective December 4, 2011, my Sunday morning SiriusXM program, Kick </strong><strong>Out the Jams, which covers the world of music, with an emphasis on music and </strong><strong>current events (or music and politics, if you prefer) moves from the Loft </strong><strong>(channel 30) to The Spectrum (channel 28). The first show on The Spectrum will </strong><strong>be the pre-recorded conversations and music with Airborne Toxic Event and Peter </strong><strong>Case that was <em>supposed </em>to have been</strong><br />
<strong>broadcast on The Loft last Sunday.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Which is, I am sure, information sufficient in itself to </strong><strong>explain the channel change. Kick Out the Jams has been on several channels </strong><strong>previously&#8211;a show pretty much evenly divided between music and talk would </strong><strong>inevitably be hard to place. </strong></p>
<p><strong>The Spectrum should be a better fit, because it plays a more diverse lineup of rock. I’m delighted to join The Spectrum, one of whose channel </strong><strong>managers is my friend Gary Schoenwetter and whose programs include Larry Kirwan’s </strong><strong>Celtic Crush and Per Gessle and Sven Lindstrom with Nordic Rox. The Spectrum is </strong> <strong>a rock channel with a harder edge than The Loft, and while Kick Out the Jams is </strong><strong>too eclectic to truly fit anywhere except the great, much-mourned Sirius Disorder </strong><strong>channel, everybody associated with Kick Out the Jams is grateful to the Spectrum for making room for it. </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davemarsh.us/?feed=rss2&#038;p=981</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s Demonizing Who?</title>
		<link>http://davemarsh.us/?p=973</link>
		<comments>http://davemarsh.us/?p=973#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Saying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemarsh.us/?p=973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama said yesterday that Dr. Martin Luther King would want &#8220;us&#8221; (whomever that may be) to &#8220;challenge the excesses of Wall Street without demonizing those who work there.” Talk about raising more questions than you answer! Let us ask: 1. For what reason should the proscription against &#8220;demonizing&#8221; apply to Operation Wall Street and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>President Obama said yesterday that Dr. Martin Luther King would want &#8220;us&#8221; (whomever that may be) to &#8220;challenge the excesses of Wall Street without demonizing those who work there.” </strong></p>
<p><strong>Talk about raising more questions than you answer! Let us ask: </strong></p>
<p><strong>1. For what reason should the proscription against &#8220;demonizing&#8221; apply to Operation Wall Street and not to the President&#8217;s own speechwriters? Through their writing, the President himself regularly demonizes black parents for their allegedly obese children, their poor choice of breakfast foods, and other sins while he&#8217;s never commented at all about the failed child-rearing skills of wealthy white parents like, say, Al and Tipper Gore. Isn&#8217;t this kind of selective, exaggerated criticism what is usually meant by &#8220;demonizing&#8221;? Another sign that this is the President demonizing is that he has never publicly dealt with the corporations that create and market the breakfast foods and other obestiy-inducing agents. </strong></p>
<p><strong>2. What evidence is there that the Occupy Wall Street forces have demonized Wall Street workers? Or even Wall Street owners? This is, after all, the President putting words in a martyr&#8217;s mouth to form an accusastion he apparently isn&#8217;t willing to voice directly. So let&#8217;s have some facts in play here&#8230;not just innuendo against those whom the President would love to condemn if there weren&#8217;t so goddamned many votes at stake. </strong></p>
<p><strong>3. Why does the President refuse to recognize that OWS regularly reaches out to workers on Wall Street? It&#8217;s not workers who have been subject to their criticism, ridicule and anger. It&#8217;s owners. </strong></p>
<p><strong>4. Why doesn&#8217;t the President follow OWS in relentlessly <em>describing </em>in plain language what Wall Street owners do and the damage it causes? </strong></p>
<p><strong>5. Why isn&#8217;t demonization of the working class by Wall Street owners and other powerful people equally subject to what I suppose we might refer to as The King Rule? </strong></p>
<p><strong>6. For that matter, if the Occupy Wall Street group must obey The King Rule what about the President himself, whose statements attempting to rationalize the assassination of Osama bin Laden and the murder-by-drone of Anwar Al-Awlaki certainly smack of demonization much more than anything anyone associated with OWS has said. </strong></p>
<p><strong>7. Does President Obama believe that more than 30 months of supporting the Wall Street ownership class justifies his putting words in Dr. Martin Luther King&#8217;s mouth? On what basis does he arrogate to himself the right to sideswipe an entirely non-violent movement to curry sympathy&#8211;or even empathy&#8211;for the Wall Street scoundrels who occupy so many posts in his cabinet? </strong></p>
<p><strong>8. If we were going to reference Dr. Martin Luther King in regard to these events would it not be better to recall what King <em>actually </em>said, for instance in his &#8220;Where Do We Go From Here&#8221; speech to the SCLC in 1967: </strong></p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Let us be dissatisfied until America will no longer have high blood pressure of creeds and an anemia of deeds. Let us be dissatisfied until the tragic walls that separate the outer city of wealth and comfort from the inner city of poverty and despair shall be crushed by the battering rams of the fires of justice. Let us be dissatisfied until they who live on the outskirts of Hope are brought into the metropolis of daily security. Let us be dissatisfied until slums are cast into the junk heap of history and every family will live in a decent, sanitary home. Let us be dissatisfied until the dark yesterdays of segregated schools will be<br />
transformed into the bright tomorrows of quality integrated education.&#8221;</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davemarsh.us/?feed=rss2&#038;p=973</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music on Kick Out the Jams for July 31, 2011</title>
		<link>http://davemarsh.us/?p=968</link>
		<comments>http://davemarsh.us/?p=968#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Booker T & the MGs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Booker T. Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clarence Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Marsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dedicated: A tribute to the Five Royales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eddie Floyd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Five Royales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kick Out the Jams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Live from the Land of Hope and Dreams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Otis Redding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam and Dave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Cropper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemarsh.us/?p=968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re pre-recorded this weekend so I can be sure that what I wrote down is what actually plays. We usually change several pieces of music every week&#8211;pieces get removed because we&#8217;re out of time (talked too much, or I miscalculated), or because I had a brainstorm on Sunday morning before the show (at home&#8211;good, I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>We&#8217;re pre-recorded this weekend so I can be sure that what I wrote down is what actually plays. We usually change several pieces of music every week&#8211;pieces get removed because we&#8217;re out of time (talked too much, or I miscalculated), or because I had a brainstorm on Sunday morning before the show (at home&#8211;good, I can snag the music and bring it; in the car, not so good, unless it happens to be available from SiriusXM computer system, which given the nature of my brainstorms it mostly won&#8217;t be).</strong></p>
<p><strong>Anyway, here&#8217;s this week program, devoted to Steve Cropper, the MGs and Lowman Pauling &amp; the 5 Royales to whom Steve&#8217;s new album pays homage. I am also a long-time fanatic about the Royales, Lowman Pauling, and indeed, his brother Clarence Paul, as he was known at Motown where he shepherded Stevie Wonder in Stevie&#8217;s early days and co-wrote several hit songs including &#8220;Hitch Hike.&#8221; Early Temptations records produced by Clarence combine vocal harmony and guitars in a way reminiscent of the Royales&#8230;and in my opinion, also of the early Rolling Stones. Which makes sense since, and you must hear the original recordings to believe the extent to which this is true, Lowman Pauling pretty much invented the kind of rock&#8217;n'roll guitar from the soul era. This isn&#8217;t to take anything away from Mickey Baker, Ike Turner, Bo Diddley and Chuck Berry. But that particular combination of integrated vocal harmony and electric guitar was principally the product of Lowman Pauling. This is even more strongly reflected at Stax&#8211;Cropper was a huge fan, and drummer Al Jackson, Jr. and original bassist Lewis Steinberg both did Memphis sessions with the Royales (the tracks from Take Me With You Baby listed below). </strong></p>
<p><strong>I&#8217;m going on vacation so the next two weeks are pre-recorded (August 7 Land of Hopes and Dreams should be live though). I&#8217;ll try to post those playlists late next week, after we figure out how much too much music I&#8217;ve written into the programs and make the necessary cuts&#8211;Dave</strong></p>
<p><strong>This is Dedicated to the One I Love, Five Royales CD: 1957 King, The &#8220;5&#8243; Royales</strong></p>
<p><strong>Green Onions, Booker T. &amp; the MGs 2:55 CD: Time Is Tight, Booker T. &amp; the MGs</strong></p>
<p><strong>Gonna Change My Way of Thinking, Bob Dylan and Mavis Staples CD: Gotta Serve Somebody&#8211;The Gospel Songs of Bob Dylan</strong></p>
<p><strong>I’m Gonna Tell Them (1960-1), 5 Royales CD: Take Me With You Baby, The &#8220;5&#8243; Royales</strong></p>
<p><strong>Catch That Teardrop (1961), 5 Royales CD: Take me With You Baby, The &#8220;5&#8243; Royales</strong></p>
<p><strong>Talk About My Woman (1962?—VJ), 5 Royales CD: Take Me With You Baby, The &#8220;5&#8243; Royales</strong></p>
<p><strong>Don’t Be Ashamed, Bettye Lavette &amp; Willie Jones CD: Dedicated, Steve Cropper</strong></p>
<p><strong>Right Around the Corner, Delbert McClinton CD: Dedicated: A Tribute to the Five Royales, Steve Cropper</strong></p>
<p><strong>Messin’ Up, Sharon Jones CD: Dedicated: A Tribute to the Five Royales, Steve Cropper</strong></p>
<p><strong>Help Me Somebody, Steve Cropper CD: Dedicated: A Tribute to the Five Royales, Steve Cropper</strong></p>
<p><strong>Thirty Second Lover, Steve Winwood CD: Dedicated: A Tribute to the Five Royales, Steve Cropper</strong></p>
<p><strong>Boot-Leg, Booker T. &amp; the MGs CD: Time Is Tight, Booker T. &amp; the MGs</strong></p>
<p><strong>Laundromat Blues, Five Royales CD: Monkey Hips and Rice: The &#8220;5&#8243; Royales Anthology</strong></p>
<p><strong>I Can’t Turn You Loose, Otis Redding Otis! The Definitive Otis Redding</strong></p>
<p><strong>Come On &amp; Save Me, Dylan Leblanc and Sharon Jones CD: Dedicated, Steve Cropper</strong></p>
<p><strong>Hey Ya, Booker T. Jones CD: Potato Hole, Booker T. Jones</strong></p>
<p><strong>Representing Memphis, Booker T. Jones featuring Matt Berninger &amp; Sharon Jones  CD: The Road from Memphis, Booker T. Jones</strong></p>
<p><strong>The Bronx, Booker T. Jones featuring Lou Reed C: The Road from Memphis, Booker T. Jones</strong></p>
<p><strong>Down in Memphis, Booker T. Jones CD: The Road from Memphis, Booker T. Jones</strong></p>
<p><strong>Just a Friend, Booker T. featuring Biz Markie, Matt Berninger &amp; Sharon Jones (bonus track) CD: The Road from Memphis, Booker T. Jones [deluxe edition]</strong></p>
<p><strong>You Left the Water Running, Otis Redding CD: Otis! The Definitive Otis Redding</strong></p>
<p><strong>A Place Nobody Can Find, Sam and Dave CD: Sweat&#8217;N'Soul: An Anthology 1965-1971, Sam and Dave</strong></p>
<p><strong>Just One More Day, Otis Redding CD: The Soul Album, Otis Redding</strong></p>
<p><strong>Cigarettes and Coffee, Otis Redding CD: The Soul Album, Otis Redding</strong></p>
<p><strong>Soothe Me (Live), Sam and Dave CD: Sweat&#8217;N'Soul: An Anthology 1965-1971, Sam and Dave</strong></p>
<p><strong>Big Bird, Eddie Floyd CD: The Best of Eddie Floyd</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davemarsh.us/?feed=rss2&#038;p=968</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Music from Kick Out the Jams July 17 and July 24, 2011</title>
		<link>http://davemarsh.us/?p=960</link>
		<comments>http://davemarsh.us/?p=960#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Gardens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Marsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kick Out the Jams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maren Parusel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Loft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Turn Off the Dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woody Guthrie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemarsh.us/?p=960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kick Out the Jams 7 17 2011 Howdido, Woody Guthrie CD: Nursery Days Do Re Me, Bob Dylan  CD: The People Speak soundtrack Pastures of Plenty/This Land is Your Land, Lila Downs CD: La Linea This Land Is Your Land, Bruce Springsteen CD: Live 1975-1985, Bruce Springsteen &#38; The E Street Band Buffalo Skinners, Jim [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><strong>Kick Out the Jams 7 17 2011</strong></h3>
<p><strong>Howdido, Woody Guthrie CD: Nursery Days</strong></p>
<p><strong>Do Re Me, Bob Dylan  CD: The People Speak soundtrack </strong></p>
<p><strong>Pastures of Plenty/This Land is Your Land, Lila Downs CD: La Linea</strong></p>
<p><strong>This Land Is Your Land, Bruce Springsteen CD: Live 1975-1985, Bruce Springsteen &amp; The E Street Band</strong></p>
<p><strong>Buffalo</strong><strong> Skinners, Jim Kweskin CD: Relax Your Mind </strong></p>
<p><strong>Oklahoma Hills, Jimmy LaFave &amp; Night Tribe CD: More Songs of Route 66</strong></p>
<p><strong>The Great Dust Storm, Woody Guthrie  CD: Dust Bowl Ballads</strong></p>
<p><strong>Dusty Old Dust (So Long It’s Been Good to Know You), Pete Seeger CD: Pete Seeger at the Village Gate with Memphis Slim and Willie Dixon </strong></p>
<p><strong>Goin’ Down That Road Feelin’ Bad,  Gwen McRae CD: Lay It On Me, The Columbia Years</strong></p>
<p><strong>I Ain’t Got No Home, Joel RafaelCD: The Songs of Woody Guthrie Vol. 1 and 2</strong></p>
<p><strong>Ramblin’ Round, Indigo Girls with Ani DiFranco CD: ‘til we outnumber ‘em  (from Rock &amp; Roll Hall of Fame Woody Guthrie tribute at Severance Hall, Cleveland)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Do Re Me, Ribbon of Highway, Slaid Cleaves with Ribbon of Highway cast featuring Bob Childers  CD: Ribbon of Highway, Endless Skyway </strong></p>
<p><strong>Hobo’s Lullaby,  Guy Carawan CD: This Little Light of Mine </strong></p>
<p><strong>Deportee, Richard Shindell CD: South of Delia</strong></p>
<p><strong>1913 Massacre, Arlo Guthrie CD: Hobo’s Lullaby</strong></p>
<p><strong>Philadelphia Lawyer, Maddox Brothers and Rose CD: America’s Most Colorful Hillbilly Band </strong></p>
<p><strong>Pretty Boy Floyd, Roger McGuinn CD: Live from Spain</strong></p>
<p><strong>Vigilante Man, Bruce Springsteen CD: Folkways: A Vision Shared </strong></p>
<p><strong>Don’t You Push Me Down, Woody Guthrie CD: Nursery Days</strong></p>
<p><strong>Car Car, Peter Paul and Mary  CD: Peter Paul and Mary in Concert</strong></p>
<p><strong>Peace Call, Eliza Gilkyson CD: Land of Milk and Honey</strong></p>
<p><strong>This Land Is Your Land, Sharon Jones &amp; the Dap Band Cd: Up in the Air soundtrack </strong></p>
<h3><strong>Kick Out the Jams 7-24 2011</strong></h3>
<p><strong>Heat Wave, The Who CD: My Generation deluxe edition</strong></p>
<p><strong>Summer Romance, Maren Parusel CD: Artificial Gardens</strong></p>
<p><strong>Love Minus Zero / No Limit, Mirah CD: Subterranean Homesick Blues: A Tribute to Bob Dylan’s Bringing It All Back Home (digital only) </strong></p>
<p><strong>Excerpts from Spiderman: Turn off the Dark (recommended only as kindling) (which come to think of it is pretty much how we used it)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Shut Your Mouth, Sidney Joe Qualls  CD: I Don’t Do This, Sidney Joe Qualls</strong></p>
<p><strong>Shaddap Yo Face, Joe Dolce 3:13 </strong></p>
<p><strong>No Banker Left Behind, Ry Cooder track from forthcoming album Pull Up Some Dust and Sit Down </strong></p>
<p><strong>Shine Silently (live), Nils Lofgren CD: New Lives: BBC Sessions</strong></p>
<p><strong>Live music from Maren Parusel and her band—all songs performed are from her album, Artificial Gardens (<a href="http://www.marenparusel.com/">www.marenparusel.com</a> or her facebook page). Special thanks to Maren for playing under great stress after her equipment van had just been robbed. Imagine how great she&#8217;ll be next time!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davemarsh.us/?feed=rss2&#038;p=960</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I have no need to write fiction</title>
		<link>http://davemarsh.us/?p=951</link>
		<comments>http://davemarsh.us/?p=951#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overpaid rock stars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U2 tax dodge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemarsh.us/?p=951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Rock &#38; Rap Confidential mailing list (www.rockrap.com). Letter to the  Baltimore Sun July 7,  2011 Sen. Benjamin Cardin&#8217;s recent letter defending Bono and his ONE foundation puts him in direct opposition to President Obama&#8217;s appeal for &#8220;corporate jet&#8221; owners to pay their fair share of tax (&#8220;Cardin: ONE Campaign works,&#8221; June 27). U2 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>From the Rock &amp; Rap Confidential mailing list (<a href="http://www.rockrap.com">www.rockrap.com</a>).</strong></p>
<p><strong>Letter to the  Baltimore Sun</strong></p>
<div>
<p><strong>July 7,  2011</strong></p>
</div>
<p><!-- sphereit start --><strong>Sen. Benjamin Cardin&#8217;s recent letter defending <a id="PECLB005275" title="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/entertainment/music/bono-PECLB005275.topic Bono" href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/entertainment/music/bono-PECLB005275.topic"></a><a id="PECLB005275" title="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/entertainment/music/bono-PECLB005275.topic Bono" href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/entertainment/music/bono-PECLB005275.topic"></a><a id="PECLB005275" title="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/entertainment/music/bono-PECLB005275.topic Bono" href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/entertainment/music/bono-PECLB005275.topic">Bono</a> and his ONE foundation puts him in direct opposition to President Obama&#8217;s appeal for &#8220;corporate jet&#8221; owners to pay their fair share of tax (&#8220;Cardin: ONE Campaign works,&#8221; June 27). <a id="PECLB004404" title="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/entertainment/music/u2-%28music-group%29-PECLB004404.topic U2 (music group)" href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/entertainment/music/u2-%28music-group%29-PECLB004404.topic"></a><a id="PECLB004404" title="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/entertainment/music/u2-%28music-group%29-PECLB004404.topic U2 (music group)" href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/entertainment/music/u2-%28music-group%29-PECLB004404.topic"></a><a id="PECLB004404" title="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/entertainment/music/u2-%28music-group%29-PECLB004404.topic U2 (music group)" href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/entertainment/music/u2-%28music-group%29-PECLB004404.topic">U2</a> are major tax evaders. I am also perturbed by Senator Cardin&#8217;s statement that Bono and the ONE campaign exercised significant influence on framing legislation in the financial services bill.</strong></p>
<div id="story-body-text">
<p><strong>Paul Hewson, aka Bono, exemplifies the worst characteristics of Wall Street, both for excess and tax evasion. He is the major financier of Spiderman, the most expensive and lavish show ever staged on Broadway. His hotel in <a id="PLGEO100100602011414" title="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/intl/republic-of-ireland/dublin-%28ireland%29-PLGEO100100602011414.topic Dublin (Ireland)" href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/intl/republic-of-ireland/dublin-%28ireland%29-PLGEO100100602011414.topic"></a><a id="PLGEO100100602011414" title="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/intl/republic-of-ireland/dublin-%28ireland%29-PLGEO100100602011414.topic Dublin (Ireland)" href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/intl/republic-of-ireland/dublin-%28ireland%29-PLGEO100100602011414.topic"></a><a id="PLGEO100100602011414" title="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/intl/republic-of-ireland/dublin-%28ireland%29-PLGEO100100602011414.topic Dublin (Ireland)" href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/intl/republic-of-ireland/dublin-%28ireland%29-PLGEO100100602011414.topic">Ireland</a>, the Clarence, is undergoing renovations to make it the most exclusive hotel in Dublin. He set up and has a large stake in Elevation, a private equity fund whose first act was to buy a controlling share of <em>Forbes</em> magazine, which celebrates wealth and over-consumption. U2 has a private jet, and Bono has a half share in a $15 million yacht, a mansion in Dublin, a house on the French Riviera and an A-list apartment inManhattan.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Ireland created a tax exemption in the early 1980&#8242;s to help artists make a modest living in a small country. U2 used and abused this exemption to amass hundreds of millions of dollars, tax free. When the Irish government put a cap on the tax exemption on royalties in 2006, U2 promptly moved that portion of their business to a Dutch tax haven. So while Bono was getting access to many of the world leaders to pressure them to double their aid budget to 0.7 percent of GDP, he himself was not even paying basic taxes. He wants ordinary people like me to pay for the causes he berates world leaders for not embracing.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Ireland is now bankrupt, and there have been calls from some government ministers for Bono to pay his taxes so the country can keep hospitals and schools open. Those appeals have fallen on deaf ears, despite the fact that Bono and U2 have extensively traded on being Irish to engender fan loyalty. While the myriad of causes Bono has taken up may seem contradictory, they are</strong><br />
<strong> actually consistent. They all serve the purpose of either promoting U2 or giving Bono access to power at the nexus of celebrity and politics, usually both. The recent appointment of Michael Elliott as CEO of ONE demonstrates the point: He is not a poverty advocate, he has been a senior editor at <em>Time</em> magazine since 2001. <em>Time</em> named Bono its Man of the Year, gave the band</strong><br />
<strong> tremendous coverage and even let Bono write editorial articles.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The ONE campaign is a lobbying group with no mandate or accountability, set up by a man who is not even a U.S. citizen. It has no relevant expertise on aid policy, let alone on the best interests of <a id="PLGEO100100600000000" title="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/us/maryland-PLGEO100100600000000.topic Maryland" href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/us/maryland-PLGEO100100600000000.topic"></a><a id="PLGEO100100600000000" title="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/us/maryland-PLGEO100100600000000.topic Maryland" href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/us/maryland-PLGEO100100600000000.topic"></a><a id="PLGEO100100600000000" title="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/us/maryland-PLGEO100100600000000.topic Maryland" href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/us/maryland-PLGEO100100600000000.topic">Maryland</a> taxpayers.</strong></p>
<p><strong>As a federal worker awaiting the outcome of the debt ceiling talks to see where I will endure cuts and taxes, I am not amused by Senator Cardin&#8217;s endorsement of Bono and ONE. As a registered Democrat and someone who voted for him, I expect him to condemn Bono&#8217;s tax evasion and refuse to work with the ONE campaign any longer.</strong></p>
<p><strong>Simon Moroney, Baltimore</strong></p>
<p><strong>[I would add to this two points:</strong></p>
<p><strong>1) Bono is a major investor in the Spiderman Broadway fiasco but he is probably not THE major investor.</strong></p>
<p><strong>2) Bono's wealth would not be at issue if he didn't spend so much time in clownish posturing to make his success "meaningful." He got rich because people spent a lot of money on his music. I would in general rather see money generated by recorded music purchases, concert tickets, etc. go to profligate rock stars than profligate corporations.  The real problem is that Bono uses his wealth to create pro-capitalist propaganda and promotes the TINA (there is no alternative) bullshit espoused by his mentor Jeffrey Sachs, which tells us that nothing but the present corporate-capitalist version of democracy can possibly be created. This is why Bono feels justified in meeting with Presidents and Prime Ministers in the midst of wars and never discussing such matters, even though the states he mainly deals with--the G8 states, particularly the US and UK--directly kill thousands of people every year in war, both their own citizens and others.</strong><strong>-- D.M.]</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davemarsh.us/?feed=rss2&#038;p=951</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Last Week on Kick Out the Jams 7 10 11</title>
		<link>http://davemarsh.us/?p=947</link>
		<comments>http://davemarsh.us/?p=947#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 20:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Saying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davemarsh.us/?p=947</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry we failed to update the last couple weeks. Send me an email at dave@davemarsh.us and I&#8217;ll send an update for 6/26 and 7/3 shows.&#8211;DM Roadrunner (live), Bo Diddley CD: Bo Diddley&#8217;s Beach Party Drive All Night, Eddie Vedder, Glen Hansard and Jake Clemens (found material) Roadrunner USA, Joan Jett CD: Hit List Swallows of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry we failed to update the last couple weeks. Send me an email at <a href="mailto:dave@davemarsh.us">dave@davemarsh.us</a> and I&#8217;ll send an update for 6/26 and 7/3 shows.&#8211;DM</p>
<p>Roadrunner (live), Bo Diddley CD: Bo Diddley&#8217;s Beach Party</p>
<p>Drive All Night, Eddie Vedder, Glen Hansard and Jake Clemens (found material)</p>
<p>Roadrunner USA, Joan Jett CD: Hit List</p>
<p>Swallows of San Juan (live), Alejandro Escovedo (from Kick Out the Jams, June 2009)</p>
<p>Make It Stop (September&#8217;s Children), Rise Against CD: Endgame</p>
<p>Give Me a Place to Stand, Thea Gilmore (fan club track&#8211;go to Theagilmore.co.uk and poke around)</p>
<p>See My Friends, Ray Davies and Spoon</p>
<p>Lola, Ray Davies and Paloma Faith</p>
<p>You Really Got Me, Ray Davies and Metallica</p>
<p>Dead End Street, Ray Davies and Amy McDonald</p>
<p>&#8216;Til the End of the Day, Ray Davies and Alex Chilton and The 88</p>
<p>ALL of the above from See My Friends, Ray Davies&#8217; latest, fantastic album</p>
<p>You Really Got Me (BBC version), The Kinks CD: The Kinks deluxe edition</p>
<p>Such a Shame, The Kinks CD: Kinda Kinks deluxe edition</p>
<p>So Mystifying, The Kinks CD: Kinks deluxe edition</p>
<p>I&#8217;m Not Like Everybody Else, The Kinks CD: The Kink Kontroversy deluxe edition</p>
<p>With God On Our Side, Bob Dylan CD: Fahrenheit 911 soundtrack (because I&#8217;d misfiled The Times They Are A-Changin&#8217; CD)</p>
<p>Like a Rolling Stone, Bob Dylan CD: Highway 61 Revisited</p>
<p>It&#8217;s All Good, Bob Dylan CD: Together Through Life</p>
<p>Radio, Raphael Saadiq 3:22 CD: Stone Rollin’, Raphael Saadiq</p>
<p>Boeing 737, The Low Anthem CD: Smart Flesh</p>
<p>Hey All You Hippies, The Low Anthem CD: Smart Flesh</p>
<p>Waterloo Sunset, Ray Davies and Jackson Browne CD: See My Friends, Ray Davies</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://davemarsh.us/?feed=rss2&#038;p=947</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

